|
|
View Full Version : Mustang VS. Haybusa....
John Moorehead Sep 13 2004, 10:59am Another blue-oval ass whoopin....
http://members.shaw.ca/dynomotive/stangvsbusa.wmv
At the beginning of the vid, the lights are the 'Stang and the Busa off in the distance...Mustang is on the right (bigger lights)
tzedek Sep 13 2004, 11:48am thats crankin...
kev_1669 Sep 13 2004, 11:51am Nice!
TX Ranger Sep 13 2004, 05:04pm pretty cool
99BlackOut Sep 13 2004, 06:23pm sweetness
basic1one Sep 13 2004, 06:30pm MY GOD!!! i used to hate mustangs and my girlfriend loves em, now im startin to lol
Thats a guy in town. Sold off the the turbo setup in the car and built a new one witha 101mm turbo. Just dynoed 845 at the wheels. And thats just at 19 psi. Looking to run another 6 pounds on that. Dynoed 590 when he ran the busa.
ReDLine Sep 13 2004, 08:26pm daaaaaamn..that busa got a potato shoved up its farter!
raines25 Sep 17 2004, 06:20am nice mustang but a stock busa is like 9.8 or something in the 1/4..if this one has nitrous shouldn't it be a little closer than that if not beat the mustang. just my thoughts
adam
97rangerguy Sep 17 2004, 11:36am nice
93SpLaShB01 Sep 17 2004, 11:46am ok ok, now, it seems to me that the busa took it on down the track(or street?) im not sure of when the 1/4 mile was up, but if that was a quarter mile a stock busa would shred a 500+600 horsepower mustang, because a stock busa put out like 210 stock, and then youve got like the 4 to five times more weight of the stang
Thats 590 rwhp, whereas the busa is crank hp. Also, it happened at 3500 feet, so the power of the busa is less than what it would be at sealevel.
derekxec Feb 24 2005, 03:00pm busa is faster in the top end than it is off the start and they run a 9.8 stock and will eat a 500-600hp mustang...i cant watch the video cause my computer will freeze :(
fzr confused Feb 24 2005, 04:44pm nice mustang but a stock busa is like 9.8 or something in the 1/4..if this one has nitrous shouldn't it be a little closer than that if not beat the mustang. just my thoughts
adam
yeah, but look at the busa's riding, his shifts dont seem very smooth, at least that is how i see it in the video....and there is only so much nitrous u can put on a busa before it becomes dangerous.....
ok ok, now, it seems to me that the busa took it on down the track(or street?) im not sure of when the 1/4 mile was up, but if that was a quarter mile a stock busa would shred a 500+600 horsepower mustang, because a stock busa put out like 210 stock, and then youve got like the 4 to five times more weight of the stang
i think the stang let up, the mustang was a bit a head, and the busa all of a sudden was next to him, so im thinking the race was over and the mustang let off....
busa is faster in the top end than it is off the start and they run a 9.8 stock and will eat a 500-600hp mustang...i cant watch the video cause my computer will freeze
apparently, it cant...or at least not that busa with that rider....he got his a$$ handed to him...thats kinda the exact opposite that happens when i race my buddies stang with my fzr :E
DangerRanger Feb 24 2005, 09:03pm THat was not a 590 hp mustang. he might have done 590 on the dyno, but he had more than that.
creep Feb 24 2005, 09:06pm only god knows who was driving that busa...
illusion20 Feb 24 2005, 09:26pm THAT STANG WAS CRAZY come on it pulled a busa...not many cars can pull any moto....stang had him by alot...it is a drag race not about top speed yea the busa would have had him if it was top speed....BUT DAMN
DangerRanger Feb 25 2005, 07:17pm theres a local 1.8t civic that pulls on liter bikes all day
vp6799 Feb 25 2005, 09:20pm That Busa should have eaten that stang. Especially if it has nitrous. The wieght ratio has a serious amount to do with it. Now you add the nitrous. No way. It should've handed that stang on a platter.. My guess is that guy was either afraid to really push it or he doesn't know that bike as good as he thinks he does.
Just my 2 cents...... :nxsmile:
fzr confused Feb 25 2005, 10:04pm the stang is a LOW 9 second stang.....nitrous doesnt drop ur ET down THAT much when u cant put it to the ground....and ur not hitting the nitrous off the line, its down the track....
That stang was runnign mid-9's at 140+ mph when that happened, he's now in the low 8's with conservative boost, 7's are easily attainable.
fzr confused Feb 25 2005, 11:48pm That stang was runnign mid-9's at 140+ mph when that happened, he's now in the low 8's with conservative boost, 7's are easily attainable.
ill take 2 :drool: :yup:
PowerRANGER9 Mar 15 2005, 09:08pm You need more than 590 whp to do low 9 sec quarter times!
ricerunner Apr 17 2005, 06:40pm You need more than 590 whp to do low 9 sec quarter times!
agreed, my friend has a supercharged SS camaro that has 570 hp and would run mid to low 11's depending on the conditions. 20 hp isnt going to drop it into the 9 second range.
Monty Apr 22 2005, 10:56pm You need more than 590 whp to do low 9 sec quarter times!
I don't want to rub anyones feathers here by offending you but it is obvious you don't know very much about drag racing, Horsepower is insignificant in drag racing, torque is where it happens. Now a turbo mustang is deadly, massive torque and top end power to boot. You don't even have to have 550 rwhp to hit 9's, its all in the torque and top end. HP is just a number. You should see the TT mustangs they are spitting out a modular power house.
DangerRanger Apr 23 2005, 08:47pm yeah but mph is where its at on the street, especially against bikes, especially against hyabusa's.
MPH=HP
circus freak Apr 24 2005, 12:16am nice mustang but a stock busa is like 9.8 or something in the 1/4..if this one has nitrous shouldn't it be a little closer than that if not beat the mustang. just my thoughts
adam
plus if you hear the guy in the background, hes complaining about the rider hitting the rev limiter. after watching it again, you can hear it rrrrriiiininininini(lol i tried), he goes past redline each gear
red2003 Jul 10 2008, 05:31pm that was dang fast
Ranger0n20sss Jul 10 2008, 06:18pm dang! that mustang is pretty damn fast! any info on it?
|