jadedmonkeys
Jun 04 2002, 01:13am
I still can't justify the $100+ difference between the KKM setup and the K&N setup. I'm thinking of just going for the KKM since I've heard good stuff about it and for it's price it seems really worth it. Is it worth it to spend the extra money for a K&N setup? Is there a noticeable difference? If anyone has got any figures, can you please tell me.
jadedmonkeys
Jun 04 2002, 01:14am
also, I understand the K&N comes with the tube. How much of a difference does it make though?
gts007
Jun 04 2002, 04:49pm
the Filterchargers are CARB certified and the KKM isn't.
Tuff_Truck_SVT
Jun 05 2002, 10:03am
We offer custom intakes for all make/model rangers in the preferred vendor area. Our MAF adapters can be machined to any size you want upto 3.5" for max. flow.
Jonnie
LSJČ MotorWorks
CHECK THE PREFERRED VENDOR AREA FOR LOW PRICES ON SUPERCHIPS AND INTAKES FOR ALL MAKE/MODEL RANGERS
jadedmonkeys
Jun 05 2002, 07:49pm
so what does that mean if its certified?
RangerIncognito
Jun 05 2002, 07:53pm
Originally posted by jadedmonkeys
so what does that mean if its certified?
You'll pass an emissions test.
If you run a non-CARB certified component on your truck and they notice it at inspection, they can fail the truck. It doesn't mean it wouldn't pass anyway, it just means the manufacturer of the component hasn't paid the big bucks to get it certified. The KKM is just as likely to pass testing as a K&N would, but KKM hasn't had it certified. My MAC isn't CARB approved either, but we don't have emissions testing here and they hardly check anything for inspection.
gts007
Jun 06 2002, 04:28pm
Yeah one reason the K&N kit is more expensive is because it comes with that nice sticker that will get you through the smog test
b4000
Jun 06 2002, 05:01pm
It's also larger than the KKM... but that's about it. Brand Name recogniztion I guess.